Philconsa weighs in on CA-House conflict


The  Philippine Constitution Association, through  the initiative of Manuel (Lolong) M. Lazaro and Ferdinand Martin G. Romualdez, chairman and president, respectively,  entreats the Supreme Court to consider the letter of the three (3) Court of Appeals (CA) Justices reporting the unexpected unorthodox reaction of the House of Representatives on the Writ of Habeas Corpus issued as an administrative matter. 

Philconsa president Ferdinand Martin G. Romualdez

This is the judicial process  to enable the Supreme Court to resolve the clashing postures in order to avert a constitutional crisis, Philconsa said.  The SC as the final arbiter of constitutional questions/legal controversies shall interpret and allocate the jurisdictional boundaries of the rights and obligations of the parties involved when a writ of habeas corpus is issued. 

Philconsa is confident the House of Representatives shall honor and implement whatever Resolution/Decision the Supreme Court may render. In the remote event the House still refuses to honor and execute the Resolution/Decision of the Supreme Court in the administrative matter, the President shall undoubtedly execute or implement the decision of the Supreme Court, as mandated by his oath of office to preserve and defend the Constitution and execute its laws.

COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by The Standard. are views by readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of While reserving this publication’s right to delete that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with The Standard editorial standards, The Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this section.

All Credit Goes There : Source link